Two Crows Belly Board

What works and what doesn't. Share design ideas, references and contacts for paipo board builders.
jbw4600
Big Wave Charger
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 6:08 pm
City: Kentfield
State or Province: CA
Country: USA
Location: Fairfax, CA
Contact:

Two Crows Belly Board

#1

Unread post by jbw4600 »

My son showed this page to me. It has little fins. What do you think? I see little fins on boards made by standard surfboard shapers. http://twocrowssurfboards.blogspot.com/ ... rd_13.html
SJB
Big Wave Charger
Posts: 221
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:39 am
City: Santa Barbara
State or Province: CAL
Country: USA
Location: Santa Barbara

Re: Two Crows Belly Board

#2

Unread post by SJB »

I cannot remember if it was Rod or Ted that turned me onto 2 inch side bites to use with thruster set up. Works great. I would think too small however to do much as sidebites alone.
FCS 2 inch sidebites.
http://www.turbotunnel.com/product.asp?productid=165177
User avatar
rodndtube
Big Wave Charger
Posts: 1163
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:34 pm
City: Arbutus Land
State or Province: Maryland
Country: USA
Interests: Waveriding, travel and the Paipo Research Project
Location: Maryland, USA & Where the Waves Are Breaking
Contact:

Re: Two Crows Belly Board

#3

Unread post by rodndtube »

I can see those fins functioning but it wouldn't be the same as having 3" or 4" fins installed on that board -- different feel and different conditions. Ted came to like the 2" sidebites that I use on the Austin type design. Not sure what depth the fins in the twocrows blog board has but it certainly has more rake/length and surface area to it. Also, from the pic it is hard to tell offset from the rails, toe-in and cant.
rodNDtube
"Prone to ride"
I love my papa li`ili`i

"The sea doth wash away all human ills."
-- Euripides.
User avatar
bgreen
Big Wave Charger
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:17 pm
City: Brisbane
State or Province: Qld
Country: Oz
Contact:

Re: Two Crows Belly Board

#4

Unread post by bgreen »

I've been communciating recently with some Simmons and hull aficinados. Small 3" fins are their preference.

I have a pair on one board, I think they need to b longer at the base - they're 4"

I'm curious to know some more about TC's.

Bob
User avatar
rodndtube
Big Wave Charger
Posts: 1163
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:34 pm
City: Arbutus Land
State or Province: Maryland
Country: USA
Interests: Waveriding, travel and the Paipo Research Project
Location: Maryland, USA & Where the Waves Are Breaking
Contact:

Re: Two Crows Belly Board

#5

Unread post by rodndtube »

Looks like they are near Haleiwa (he Old Sugar Mill Waialua) and in Santa Cruz. The Old Sugar Mill has become something like an incubator in the surf industry -- a fin producer, old Turbo-style bodyboard builder if I recall and others.
rodNDtube
"Prone to ride"
I love my papa li`ili`i

"The sea doth wash away all human ills."
-- Euripides.
jbw4600
Big Wave Charger
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 6:08 pm
City: Kentfield
State or Province: CA
Country: USA
Location: Fairfax, CA
Contact:

Re: Two Crows Belly Board

#6

Unread post by jbw4600 »

I am going to try some "keel" type fins next time I buy fins.
User avatar
bgreen
Big Wave Charger
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:17 pm
City: Brisbane
State or Province: Qld
Country: Oz
Contact:

Re: Two Crows Belly Board

#7

Unread post by bgreen »

I e-mailed Two Crows. Nick & Carl replied, not sure which one though. They said they make a board a month or so and are experimenting with fins and bottoms.

I asked for some more details regarding who is riding them/where.


Bob
User avatar
Ted
Big Wave Charger
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:02 pm
City: Las Vegas
State or Province: Nevada
Country: USA
Interests: HPD, Austin 50", Xylem 47"

Re: Two Crows Belly Board

#8

Unread post by Ted »

The low volume and dished deck look attractive to me. Rod's 2" sidebites with 4" center work great on the Austin, but after riding a finless board for a while, I wonder how much fin is needed.
User avatar
krusher74
Big Wave Charger
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:53 pm
City: easkey
State or Province: co sligo
Country: Ireland
Interests: Surfing, vintage cars and motorbikes
Location: Easky, Co sligo , ireland
Contact:

Re: Two Crows Belly Board

#9

Unread post by krusher74 »

Ted wrote:The low volume and dished deck look attractive to me. Rod's 2" sidebites with 4" center work great on the Austin, but after riding a finless board for a while, I wonder how much fin is needed.
I agree totally, i have never had a finned board, when i had a go on a friends paipo with fins it tracked horribly, i can grind a turn as hard as a like just on a rail, no fins needed and break the rail free for 360's
jbw4600
Big Wave Charger
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 6:08 pm
City: Kentfield
State or Province: CA
Country: USA
Location: Fairfax, CA
Contact:

Re: Two Crows Belly Board

#10

Unread post by jbw4600 »

There are many different styles of riding. But I surfed for 20 years without fins/skegs and I am having a blast with fins again now. I don't do 360s, but crank turns as hard as anyone and on my board the fins don't inhibit turning at all. I can turn on dime. I find they really help on making sections when you are going down the line and make your bottom turns very fast. The fins on the board you surfed might not of had any toe in or cant. If the fins are straight and uncanted, they make the board track too much. The great thing about Thomas Patrick boards is that he also puts a bevel in the last foot or less to help initiate turning. The other thing is that with fins you don't have to push the inside rail into the wave or drag a swim fin to hold onto the wave. The fins/skegs do the work for you. But there are many ways of doing it.
User avatar
bgreen
Big Wave Charger
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:17 pm
City: Brisbane
State or Province: Qld
Country: Oz
Contact:

Re: Two Crows Belly Board

#11

Unread post by bgreen »

I think it is a matter of being able to draw different lines. I have a couple of boards I have ridden with and without fins. I now mostly ride them with fins, for shorter arcs and a bit more control (both when going really fast and when hitting a fat section on a wide tailed board). Again, it comes back to how you want to ride a wave and the type of waves you are riding (and how much water is beneath you).

Getting the fins right can be difficult, I've certainly had boards that tracked too much, hence smaller fins, foiled on one side only (twin fins).

I think your surfing background (standup, bodysurfer, bodyboarder, kneeboarder etc) is going to effect how you see this as well.

vive la difference
Bob
User avatar
rodndtube
Big Wave Charger
Posts: 1163
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:34 pm
City: Arbutus Land
State or Province: Maryland
Country: USA
Interests: Waveriding, travel and the Paipo Research Project
Location: Maryland, USA & Where the Waves Are Breaking
Contact:

Re: Fins or Not?

#12

Unread post by rodndtube »

As in any discussion on board design it is a matter of compromise. I would argue that fins are better for projection and for sustaining momentum in white water sections. I also find them useful for many other things but to an extent that is conditioning from 4 decades of riding with fins. I tend to ride a 2x1 setup with small sidebites -- 2" -- and really notice a difference when they get up to 2.75" or more (tracking?). My center fin isn't huge - 4 to 5 inches.
rodNDtube
"Prone to ride"
I love my papa li`ili`i

"The sea doth wash away all human ills."
-- Euripides.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests